Reviews
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)
Optimal management strategies for patients presenting with complicated peritoneal carcinomatosis in the emergency setting: a clinical perspective
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 3 July 2025
534
Views
137
Downloads
Authors
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) often represents an advanced intra-abdominal malignancy. In some cases, bowel obstruction represents the first manifestation of cancer; in others, it indicates disease progression in previously treated patients. Individuals presenting to the emergency department with symptoms such as vomiting and abdominal pain require prompt assessment to determine the appropriateness of conservative versus surgical management, decisions frequently made under prognostic uncertainty and limited survival expectations. Recent evidence suggests that surgery can offer symptomatic relief in selected patients, though it is associated with significant perioperative risks and has a limited impact on long-term survival. Non-operative management – including bowel rest, somatostatin analogues, corticosteroids, and antiemetics – remains the first-line approach in hemodynamically stable patients. Given the absence of formal guidelines, this commentary underscores the need for evidence-based recommendations, expert consensus, and the integration of palliative principles into emergency care. Communication strategies, individualized triage, and ethical alignment with patient values are essential to avoid inadvertently harmful interventions. Data from the ongoing World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES)-endorsed international “End-of-Life Care” survey are expected to inform future best practices.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
1. Esquivel J, Elias D, Baratti D, et al. Consensus statement on the loco-regional treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. J Surg Oncol 2007;96:577-80.
2. Lambert LA, Hendrix RJ. Palliative Management of Advanced Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018;27:585-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2018.02.008
3. Bleicher J, Lambert LA. A Palliative Approach to Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Malignant Ascites. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021;30:475-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2021.02.004
4. van Oudheusden TR. Systematic review of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:2949-56.
5. Ripamonti C, Twycross R, Baines M, et al. Clinical-practice Recommendations for the Management of Bowel Obstruction in Patients with End-stage Cancer. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:29-40.
6. Neri B, Citterio N, Schiavone SC, et al. Malignant Bowel Occlusion: An Update on Current Available Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2025;17:1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091522
7. Feuer DJ, Broadley KE, Shepherd JH, Barton DP. Systematic review of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;CD002764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002764
8. Laval G, Marcelin-Benazech B, Guirimand F, et al. Recommendations for bowel obstruction with peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;48:75-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.022
9. Madariaga A, Lau J, Ghoshal A, et al. MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022;30:4711-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06889-8
10. Sepúlveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A. Palliative Care: the World Health Organization's global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24:91-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00440-2
11. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:733-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1000678
12. Morrison RS, Meier DE. Clinical practice. Palliative care. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2582-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp035232
13. Weissman DE, Meier DE. Identifying patients in need of a palliative care assessment in the hospital setting: a consensus report from the Center to Advance Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2011;14:17-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0347
14. Tuca A, Guell E, Martinez-Losada E, et al. Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients: epidemiology, management, and factors influencing spontaneous resolution. Cancer Manag Res 2012;4:159-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S29297
15. Miner TJ, Cohen J, Charpentier K, et al. The Palliative Triangle: Improved Patient Selection and Outcomes Associated With Palliative Operations. Arch Surg 2011;146:517-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.92
16. National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction Steering Group. Outcomes following small bowel obstruction due to malignancy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45:2319-24.
17. Shariat-Madar B, Jayakrishnan TT, Gamblin TC, Turaga KK. Surgical management of bowel obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:666-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23707
18. Paul Olson TJ, Pinkerton C, Brasel KJ, Schwarze ML. Palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from carcinomatosis: a systematic review. JAMA Surg 2014;149:383-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4059
19. Krouse RS, Anderson GL, Arnold KB, et al. Surgical Palliation versus Nonoperative Management for Malignant Bowel Obstruction: The SWOG S1316 Randomized Trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;8:908-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00191-7
20. Bateni SB, Law CHL, Nadler A, et al. Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Associated with Treatment Modality for Malignant Bowel Obstruction. Ann Surg 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006745
21. Santangelo ML, Grifasi C, Criscitiello C, et al. Bowel obstruction and peritoneal carcinomatosis in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:73-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0656-9
22. Lodoli C, Covino M, Attalla El Halabieh M, et al. Prognostic Factors for Surgical Failure in Malignant Bowel Obstruction and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Front Surg 2021;8:769658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.769658
23. Hamilton TD, Selby D, Tsang ME, et al. Patients’ perceptions of palliative surgical procedures: a qualitative analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2017;6:S77-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2017.01.04
24. Kruser JM, Taylor LJ, Campbell TC, et al. Best Case/Worst Case: Training Surgeons to Use a Novel Communication Tool for High-Risk Acute Surgical Problems. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:2555-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.014
25. Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, et al. “Best Case/Worst Case”: Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Communication Tool for Difficult in-the-Moment Surgical Decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:1805-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13615
How to Cite
Optimal management strategies for patients presenting with complicated peritoneal carcinomatosis in the emergency setting: a clinical perspective. (2025). Surgery in Geriatrics and Frailty, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/sigaf.2025.27
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.